clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Lawsuits

The latest twist in the saga of developer Extell's Rushmore condo, long embroiled in a legal fight: the developer's lawyers allegedly admitted to the state attorney general back in April 2010 that the typo defense?Extell's argument that it didn't need to give refunds to 41 disgruntled buyers because the 2008 closing date in the offering plan was simply a typo? didn't hold water. The developer has until March 1 to submit a response, but in the meantime, at least A-Rod is happy. [Real Deal; previously]