clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Archiquestions

New, 17 comments

The proposed demolition of a Brutalist building in Goshen, NY, has prompted a debate: are some buildings ugly enough that they should just be torn down? A bunch of preservationists and design writers discuss the issue over at the Times, and some believe it's better to preserve examples of unusual buildings even if they're ugly. The other side of the argument: "A single such building can ruin an entire townscape, and it is often difficult to believe that such ruination was not the intention of the architect." Anyone want to nominate an NYC building for demolition by virtue of ugliness? [NYT]