clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

In the Rezone

New, 22 comments

Proponents of the Midtown East rezoning are now arguing that tearing down aging, inefficient buildings would be better for greening the city than trying to preserve them. A new report by an environmental consulting group found that "a building that is torn down can be rebuilt with 44% more square footage and still use 5% less energy. The bottom line is that the energy needed to tear down and rebuild a tower could be offset by energy savings from the new structure in 15 to 28 years." This pretty much contradicts every energy-related argument of preservationists. [Crain's; previously]